Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!sdrc!crgabb
From: crgabb@sdrc.UUCP (Rob Gabbard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: 8mm backup. Time required to back up 2.3 gb
Summary: DN3000 rate is slower than on a DN4000
Message-ID: <469@sdrc.UUCP>
Date: 10 Dec 88 17:23:19 GMT
References: <8812091434.AA04668@richter.mit.edu>
Organization: Structural Dynamics Research Corp., Cincinnati
Lines: 19

In article <8812091434.AA04668@richter.mit.edu>, krowitz@RICHTER.MIT.EDU (David Krowitz) writes:
> one of the Workstation Solutions' drives attached to a 4MB DN3000, and it
> seems to be running about 120 MB/hour. These figures are for doing full

If I remember right - isn't the sustained rate of the Workstation Solutions
drive slower on a DN3000 than on a DN4000 ? Its got something to do with the
bus. I believe the 120mb/hr is just about right on the nose of the figure
on Workstation Solutions pamphlet while on a DN4000 it hits 150mb/hr (the same
as the Kennedy).  I don't have the pamphlet with me - or I may be be getting
it confused with the figures on the Danford Exabyte which is basically the same
thing.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rob Gabbard (uunet!sdrc!crgabb)                 _    /|
Workstation Systems Programmer                  \'o.O'
Structural Dynamics Research Corporation        =(___)=   
                                                   U
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=