Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!jgreco From: jgreco@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Joseph E Greco) Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm Subject: Re: Quantum Link - telecommunication at it's poorest Message-ID: <14@csd4.milw.wisc.edu> Date: 20 Dec 88 21:10:42 GMT References: <256@texhrc.UUCP> Sender: news@csd4.milw.wisc.edu Reply-To: jgreco@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (Joseph E Greco) Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Lines: 21 In article <256@texhrc.UUCP> rls@texhrc.UUCP (Bob Simmons) writes: > >Frank Prindle complains of difficulties using Quantum Link and I can >certainly echo many of his complaints. Having to disconnect peripherals just >to log on is an old complaint, but Qlink has apparently not yet decided to >listen to its dwindling customer base. I cancelled my subscription some time >ago when I got the distinct impression that Qlink considered my wanting to >use their service an imposition. Compuserve, the biggest of them all, is Has anybody had any success using a BusCard II and 4040 or 8050 with QuantumLink? I gave up 1541's a long time ago and have never really regretted it. I probably wouldn't consider subscribing because of some horror stories I've heard locally, and because I really don't like being locked into that kind of software, but I have seen a few good things in the past. Can anyone compare Q-Link to GEnie (currently)? . JG -- Joe Greco