Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!mcnc!rti!bcw From: bcw@rti.UUCP (Bruce Wright) Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec.micro Subject: Re: TURBOW-286 Summary: Seems to work pretty well Message-ID: <2625@rti.UUCP> Date: 10 Dec 88 06:44:23 GMT References: <798@cs.rit.edu> Organization: Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC Lines: 49 In article <798@cs.rit.edu>, iav1917%ritcv@cs.rit.edu ((alan i. vymetalik)) writes: > > Rainbow folk: > > Well, as far as I can tell, Suitable Solutions has begun to ship > their 80826/80287 accelerator card for the Rainbow 100B/+. > It is, in fact, shipping in _very_ limited quantities, due to the chip shortage. The on-board cache it uses is a variety of static RAM which has been hard to get of late and may not be available in large quantity until next year. We have obtained one and have been testing it. As you mentioned, it contains a 12MHz 80286 (CMOS) and room for an 80287. If the cache / high speed clock are turned on (this can be done from software) it does indeed give a Norton SI of 8.3, which puts it squarely in the AT category. You cannot install an 8088 or an 8087 with the Turbow - the 80286/80287 take their place. The software switch just turns on high speed mode for the 80286. In practice, we have found that very few programs have problems with the Turbow board, and have not found ANY compatibility problems if the accelerator switch is OFF. Most of the problems are with graphics programs - many graphics programs copy some code from the DEC graphics board documentation which has some bugs in it, and there are also some new timing problems with using the graphics board which never used to be possible. [Technobabble insert: The problems all revolve around the fact that it is possible to load the Graphics Display Controller (GDC) with commands faster than it can execute them. This is possible even on the old 8088, but it is even more of a problem on the 80286. Many programs don't check the GDC for busy properly, and (even worse) even if the GDC is not busy it is possible to execute certain register load sequences too rapidly which throws it into a tizzy. If you have access to the source the fix is usually pretty easy; if you don't you can always do a TURBOW OFF and we have yet to see a program which isn't fixed by this. I understand however that AUTOCAD and possibly a couple of others may still have problems and that there is a special version of the Turbow board which slows down the graphics board I/O just for AUTOCAD]. I have heard that there is a version of Windows that someone is working on and is "close" but I don't know when/if it will be available. All in all I would give it pretty high marks. As usual, I think Jerry Miller has done his homework pretty well on this one. Bruce C. Wright