Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!uw-june!uw-entropy!dataio!bright
From: bright@Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Turbo C 2.0 is wonderful, but... help!
Keywords: TurboC
Message-ID: <1793@dataio.Data-IO.COM>
Date: 19 Dec 88 19:44:42 GMT
References: <8404@megaron.arizona.edu>
Reply-To: bright@dataio.Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright)
Organization: Data I/O Corporation; Redmond, WA
Lines: 8

In article <8404@megaron.arizona.edu> cjeffery@arizona.edu (Clinton Jeffery) writes:
<I have a neato little program which compiled to 48K under TC 1.0 LMM, 
<but now compiles to over 100K under TC 2.0!
<But what could make it that drastic, and what must I do to get my nice
<48K .EXE file back under 2.0?

Generate a .MAP file for the one under 1.0 and for the one under 2.0.
Comparing them should give you the information you need.