Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!moriarty From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Word Processor (and Mac) statistics.... Message-ID: <6289@fluke.COM> Date: 12 Dec 88 19:42:23 GMT References: <81009@sun.uucp> Sender: news@tc.fluke.COM Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer) Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 30 In article <81009@sun.uucp> chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: > o For all the bitching and moaning, when people have work to get > done, they turn to word. It's not just dominant, it's overwhelming. I often wonder if this isn't so much Word's abilities as Word's popularity. When writing articles for various magazines, I would prefer writing them in FullWrite; however, the editors and publishers don't have FWP, they have Word. I could always save the copy I send to them in MacWrite format, but often there are formats I've used (two columns, imbedded graphics, etc.) which cannot be ported into MacWrite. So I have to use Word. Gag. However, I don't know if that is a common complaint. When Ashton-Tate talked about FullWrite, I asked if there were any plans to have FWP save in Word 3.0 format. I was told later that Microsoft was very proprietary about other word processors using the Word 3.0 format. I've heard other stories from Microsoft, though (but I think they were talking about freeing up the format for *non*-word processors, like PageMaker, spelling checking utilities and other things that would either be utilities to Word, or not compete directly with Word). Anyone had experience with getting Word 3.0 format -- or using it in your program? "So we're not alone. Now I have to die -- *now*! Just when human history promises to become interesting!" --- Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer INTERNET: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM Manual UUCP: {uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty CREDO: You gotta be Cruel to be Kind... <*> DISCLAIMER: Do what you want with me, but leave my employers alone! <*>