Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:24036 comp.sys.mac.programmer:3556 rec.music.synth:5544
Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!purdue!decwrl!labrea!Portia!Jessica!rdsesq
From: rdsesq@Jessica.stanford.edu (Rob Snevely)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.programmer,rec.music.synth
Subject: LSP 2.0 (smaller code...You betcha)
Keywords: LSP
Message-ID: <4402@Portia.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 15 Dec 88 18:11:08 GMT
Sender: news@Portia.Stanford.EDU
Reply-To: rdsesq@Jessica.stanford.edu (Rob Snevely)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 14

I finally got my LSP 20 upgrade. (YEA!!!) After reading some of the postings
about possible larger code size, I was sceptical about it. However, that
scepticism is rapidly fading. I got it set up and recompiled a very small
program. After saving the source as text, I loaded it created a new project,
added the file, recompiled, and (TA DA) 30 % smaller. I tried another and
almost 40% smaller. So to Rich and THINK, I am impressed. For me it was
worth the wait. However, I could use MacApp or its equivalent for LSP.
Any idea on when or if this will happen.

rob

rdsesq@jessica.stanford.edu

Disclaimer: I don't work for think or sumantec, I am for the moment atleast
a very satisfied customer.