Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: ccicpg!zardoz!neil@uunet.uu.net (Neil Gorsuch)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: Advice wanted on fileservers and net-loading
Message-ID: <44525@zardoz.UUCP>
Date: 20 Dec 88 10:07:45 GMT
References: <8811251707.AA12822@uk.ac.oxford.robots>
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 26
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: 12 Dec 88 22:29:39 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 64, message 6 of 12

pcl@robots.oxford.ac.uk (Paul Leyland) writes:
>I would welcome advice, thoughts and opinions on the following problem.
>How do we upgrade a small-to-medium size system into a medium-to-large
>size one?
>
>The question is: how can we best achieve this?  "Best" includes ease of
>adminstration, floor-space required and maintenance, as well as low cost.

I recently had a conversation with a gentleman at Los Alamos National
Laboratory about the relative merits and costs of using 3/50's and 3/xxx's
as files servers for diskless clients.  He pointed out that a 3/50 for
about $3500 and a 300 Mb CDC Wren shoebox drive system for about $2900,
total about $6400, will serve 3 to 5 diskless 3/50's or 3/60's without any
problems whatsoever, as long as the server 3/50 is only used as a server.
In fact, the stock 4 Mbytes of memory is more than adequate for the
network server daemons and Sunos.  Compare that to maybe 5 to 10 times as
much money for an "official" sun 3/xxx server with eagle drives that can
handle 15 or so diskless clients comfortably, and the price/performance
ratio  is clearly in favor of using 3/50's as file servers.  If backup is
a concern, buy an Exabyte 2 Gbyte 8 mm tape drive from someone for about
$4500.  This route is more of a pain to setup, but the total cost
reductions are quite dramatic.

neil@cpd.com
uunet!ccicpg!zardoz!neil
(714) 547-3000