Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!bigtex!pmafire!dave
From: dave@pmafire.UUCP (Dave Remien)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Compile errors on V/386 3.0E
Summary: AT&T is less compatible with AT&T than anyone
Message-ID: <511@pmafire.UUCP>
Date: 12 Dec 88 16:10:49 GMT
References: <680@wa3wbu.UUCP> <417@zinn.MV.COM> <273@uport.UUCP>
Reply-To: dave@pmafire.UUCP (Dave Remien)
Distribution: na
Organization: Department of Obfuscation Redundancy Department
Lines: 15


	[stuff about signal type declarations deleted]
>
>I thought type void meant "nothing returned", yet signal is clearly type void
>and it returns something!  What don't I understand here? :-)

Any more about AT&T than the rest of us do? I.E., not much? ;-).

>
>   John Plocher


-- 
Dave Remien - WINCO Computer Engineering Group (only somewhat confused, now)
208-526-3523 Paths: ...!bigtex!pmafire!dave | ...!ucdavis!egg-id!pma386!dave