Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!rwc102
From: RWC102@PSUVM (R. W. F. Clark)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: High Volume Calls For New Approach
Message-ID: <64532RWC102@PSUVM>
Date: 10 Dec 88 02:07:25 GMT
References: <26469@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <1988Dec8.172749.11645@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: Culture is Our Business is Our Culture
Lines: 12

In article <1988Dec8.172749.11645@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) says:
>
>Unfortunately, signatures containing network address, not just name, are
>a practical necessity if you want people to be able to get mail to you.
>The article-header information is *not* sufficient except in very favorable
>cases.
>

Actually, I can usually get r to work about a third of the time.
In about seventy-five percent of the other cases, the Path: line
will be sufficient.  It seems that only in the more unfavorable
cases is the information not sufficient.

fc