Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!njin!princeton!njsmu!telesci!fantasci!jep From: jep@fantasci.UUCP (Joseph E Poplawski) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: High Volume Calls For New Approach Message-ID: <349@fantasci.UUCP> Date: 20 Dec 88 15:35:43 GMT References: <26469@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <1988Dec8.172749.11645@utzoo.uucp> <968@vsi.COM> Reply-To: jep@fantasci.UUCP (Joseph E Poplawski) Organization: Fantasci Incorporated Lines: 26 In article <968@vsi.COM> friedl@vsi.COM (Stephen J. Friedl) writes: >In article <1988Dec8.172749.11645@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes: >> Including physical address and phone number is >> pointless, so there's no need to clutter up the >> signature with them. > >Not necessarily. I include my phone number in my .sig because >people *do* call me with questions, and if somebody posts a hot >problem and I know the answer, I call if I can. And I have had several instances where I have been called at home. One instanceI had sent someone some source code that they posted they needed, and they then called me at home to thank me (more personal than mail). In another, a question I had asked which needed a software solution helped me receive USmail from a few different software vendors and even followup calls. So I think that anyone who wishes to include their address/telephone # in their signature should do so. Just be prepared for some "junk" mail to start showing up in your USmail box... -Jo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Joseph E Poplawski (Jo) US Mail: 1621 Jackson Street | | Cinnaminson NJ 08077 | | UUCP:..!rutgers!rochester!moscom!telesci!fantasci!jep | | ..!princeton!telesci!fantasci!jep | | ..!pyrnj!telesci!fantasci!jep Phone: +1 609 786-8099 home | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------