Xref: utzoo sci.philosophy.tech:877 sci.bio:1664 bionet.molbio.evolution:43
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!bionet!iuvax!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!hal!nic.MR.NET!rhesus!bin
From: bin@primate.wisc.edu (Brain in Neutral)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,sci.bio,bionet.molbio.evolution
Subject: Re: How to debate the creationists.
Message-ID: <448@rhesus.primate.wisc.edu>
Date: 13 Dec 88 20:46:47 GMT
References: <4029b61d.ffb5@bumper.engin.umich.edu>
Organization: UW-Madison Primate Center
Lines: 14

> So to come to the point:  If creationists are right and evolution is
> nonsense, then how can it be that when one implements a computer
> simulation of evolution (of the right type) the simulation turns
> out to be an algorithm that has tremendous practical value?

It appears you are offering support for an argument from
design (probably not your intent):

> nonsense, then how can it be that when one implements a computer
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^
                                              (design)
Paul DuBois
dubois@primate.wisc.edu	rhesus!dubois
bin@primate.wisc.edu	rhesus!bin