Xref: utzoo can.politics:2100 can.francais:131 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!watcsc!death From: death@watcsc.uucp (Trevor Green) Newsgroups: can.politics,can.francais Subject: Re: Bourassa and Bill 101 Summary: We're treading on thin ice here! Keywords: Quebec, constitution, perilously close Message-ID: <1989Jan14.134236.5958@watcsc.uucp> Date: 14 Jan 89 18:42:32 GMT Expires: Jan 31 1989 References: <88Dec21.113818est.9269@ois.db.toronto.edu> <2541@looking.UUCP> <836@mannix.iros1.UUCP> <17099@onfcanim.UUCP> <762@myrias.UUCP> <17162@onfcanim.UUCP> Reply-To: death@watcsc.UUCP (Trevor Green) Distribution: can Organization: University of Waterloo Computer Science Club Lines: 33 In article <17162@onfcanim.UUCP> dave@onfcanim.UUCP (Dave Martindale) writes: > >Perhaps this is an interesting question: If Quebec was a completely >independent country, would it have the right to determine for itself >whether the language of signs was protected by freedom of speech? > >If not, why not? Can a country not determine for itself what rights >its citizens shall have? Did Germany 1933-45 have the right to determine for itself whether the lives, businesses, religion, etc. of Jews and Gypsies was protected by anything? If not, why not? Can a country not determine for itself what rights its citizens shall have? >If so, why is it that what it is right and "moral" for a country to >determine these things, but it is not right or moral for a province to >do so? There is one fundamental right: the right of all human beings to lead human lives as they so choose. This is IMHO the only way in which the world and all its citizens can be truly free. Noone nor any group, whether or not in the majority in the resident nation, can decide to remove any part of this individual determination, whether such action is as harsh as Stalin's Purges or as mellow as Bill 178. ...we now interrupt my pontifications and return you to your normally scheduled flamefest... -- Trev "I know! We can make machine language Scrabble! You'd only need two kinds of tiles." -- anonymous, overheard