Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uccba!uceng!dmocsny From: dmocsny@uceng.UC.EDU (daniel mocsny) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Robots & free will (was Re: The limitations of logic) Summary: Sending in the boys. Keywords: Choosing thoughts. Message-ID: <549@uceng.UC.EDU> Date: 1 Jan 89 20:07:30 GMT References: <3328@sdsu.UUCP> <43228@linus.UUCP> <539@uceng.UC.EDU> <2173@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> Organization: Univ. of Cincinnati, College of Engg. Lines: 34 In article <2173@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>, gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton) writes: > 4) I used to teach in a mixed school, where the girls could fight just > as viciously as the boys (true also of the Bigg Market in > Newcastle upon Tyne in England :-)). Finally, Margaret Thatcher > sent the UK fleet to the Falklands, Golda Meier could send in the > boys too, and Nancy Reagan ordered the troops into Grenada :-) I'm not saying women are incapable of aggression and violence. They are, but killing on a massive scale has historically been an exclusively male domain. Even when a woman happens to be the figurehead in authority and giving the orders, she is making decisions in the context of male-dominated political structure. After all, she is sending in the _boys_. What's more, I think I could argue, perhaps tenuously, that the 2.5 cases you cite might be responses to male aggression on the other side. Perhaps a society of women could spontaneously meld themselves into an effective fighting force, and go forth to heap destruction on each other without the help of men. But as we have not the slightest precedent for such, I think Occam's razor suggests we begin with the male brain in our search for the roots of organized violence. I have to side with Gilbert's views on the prospects for super-rational machines of our invention guiding our affairs with wisdom and benevolence. To me this sounds like a long reach, to say the very least. I think a more realistic approach, though hardly one I'm going to bet on, is to understand and modify the mechanisms of violent human behavior. At least we have a thin shred of hope: already some people, in some contexts, live much of their lives without _deliberately_ inflicting harm on their neighbors. Cheers, Dan Mocsny