Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ncar!tank!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdurb!aglew
From: aglew@mcdurb.Urbana.Gould.COM
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: SPARC @ 20 mips
Message-ID: <28200259@mcdurb>
Date: 6 Jan 89 01:51:00 GMT
References: <1125@raspail.UUCP>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:raspail.UUCP:1125:mcdurb:28200259:000:291
Nf-From: mcdurb.Urbana.Gould.COM!aglew    Jan  5 19:51:00 1989


>If one can believe performance numbers in advertisements, then
>
>    SPARC @ 30ns == R3000 @ 40ns
>
>which, IMHO, implies that MIPS is the better architecture.
					^^ implementation ^

I am probably sticking my foot in it, but isn't MIPs
double clocked? But then, SPARC probably is, too.