Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!steve
From: steve@oakhill.UUCP (steve)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: A New Way To Write Old Standards (Or: An exercise in futility)
Summary: Spreading the discussion
Keywords: Standard standardization ambiguity revision
Message-ID: <1761@devsys.oakhill.UUCP>
Date: 3 Jan 89 19:52:35 GMT
References: <583@mbph.UUCP> <1760@devsys.oakhill.UUCP>
Organization: Motorola Inc. Austin, Tx
Lines: 17


I am sorry for this quickie follow-up but I can not get cancel to work.

An additional P.S. to my last article is that if this dicussion bears any
relevant fruit, we should spread it into other groups to widen the 
view-point.  It doesn't help anyone if we solve problems if the whole
world ignores us.

                   enough from this mooncalf - Steven
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
These opinions aren't necessarily Motorola's or Remora's - but I'd like to
think we share some common views.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven R Weintraub                        cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!devsys!steve
Motorola Inc.  Austin, Texas 
(512) 440-3023 (office) (512) 453-6953 (home)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------