Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ukma!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Bondage and Discipline Languages
Message-ID: <2593@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 1 Jan 89 04:30:59 GMT
References: <3300001@uxg.cso.uiuc.edu> <eWbWj#4OkIf8=eric@snark.uucp> <13073@cup.portal.com>
Organization: Xenix Support
Lines: 11

Dan Hankins says Smalltalk is nonprocedural.

Funny, I always though 'procedural' referred to control flow. So a non-
procedural language would be something like a declarative language (Prolog,
for example) or a dataflow language (don't know of any offhand, apart from
ladder diagrams).
-- 
Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation.
Work: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180.   `-_-'
Home: bigtex!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.uu.net.                 'U`
Opinions may not represent the policies of FICC or the Xenix Support group.