Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!scubed!s3snorkel!warner
From: warner@s3snorkel.ARPA (Ken Warner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: Smalltalk versus C++
Keywords: object-oriented languages
Message-ID: <907@scubed.UUCP>
Date: 6 Jan 89 16:43:30 GMT
References: <447@ubbpc.UUCP> <824@laura.UUCP> <451@ubbpc.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@scubed.UUCP
Reply-To: warner@s3snorkel.UUCP (Ken Warner)
Organization: S-Cubed, San Diego California
Lines: 15

In article <451@ubbpc.UUCP> wgh@ubbpc.UUCP (William G. Hutchison) writes:
>In article <824@laura.UUCP>, georg@exunido.uucp (Georg A. M. Heeg) writes:
>> In article <447@ubbpc.UUCP> wgh@ubbpc.UUCP (William G. Hutchison) writes:
>> >(1) Smalltalk creates classes dynamically, whereas C++ does it statically.

Duh...sorry to intrude on your conversation but could you explain to me
the difference between dynamic and static classes.  I'm not trying to pick
a fight; I really don't understand the difference.

>> >(3) Smalltalk has multiple inheritance...

I am working with ParcPlace ST-80.  How do I do multiple-inheritance?  It 
sounds interesting.

Ken Warner