Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mailrus!ncar!ames!pacbell!pbhyf!rob
From: rob@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Rob Bernardo)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: elm 2.1PL1 - general comments
Message-ID: <4426@pbhyf.PacBell.COM>
Date: 22 Dec 88 16:21:34 GMT
References: <79@titania.warwick.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rob@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Rob Bernardo)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 17

In article <79@titania.warwick.ac.uk> cudcv@warwick.ac.uk (Rob McMahon) writes:
+Just a couple of miscellaneous comments.  These are just minor niggles, please
+don't take this as criticism, just areas I think could stand some improvement.

As one of the ELM developers I want to thank Rob McMahon for pointing out
so clearly the problems he's found in ELM 2.1PL1. As far as I'm concerned, no
nit is too small to pick.

The good news is that many of the problems Rob pointed out have been 
rendered moot in ELM 2.2. Also many others have already been resolved 
in ELM 2.2. And for the remaining, a tip of my hat in thanks for 
pointing out problems we haven't yet uncovered ourselves. 
-- 
Rob Bernardo, Pacific Bell UNIX/C Reusable Code Library
Email:     ...![backbone]!pacbell!pbhyf!rob   OR  rob@pbhyf.PacBell.COM
Office:    (415) 823-2417  Room 4E750A, San Ramon Valley Administrative Center
Residence: (415) 827-4301  R Bar JB, Concord, California