Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!maxim!prc
From: prc@maxim.ERBE.SE (Robert Claeson)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Problems with Elm 2.1 on V/386
Message-ID: <446@maxim.ERBE.SE>
Date: 22 Dec 88 09:15:24 GMT
References: <170@wa3wbu.UUCP> <1658@nud.UUCP>
Organization: ERBE DATA AB
Lines: 17

In article <1658@nud.UUCP>, df@nud.UUCP (Dale Farnsworth) writes:

> John Gayman (john@wa3wbu.UUCP) writes of an incompatibility between
> elm2.1 and smail2.5 on his SVR3 system.  Elm passes a -s option to
> /bin/rmail and rmail complains it is illegal.

> The easiest workaround is when you Configure elm, just tell it that
> you're running v5 rather than v.3.  I think v.3 should only be specified
> for SVR3 systems that aren't running smail or sendmail.

I run ELM 2.1 PL1 on a system with SVR3.1 and sendmail, so I think
this only applies to smail, not sendmail.
-- 
Robert Claeson, ERBE DATA AB, P.O. Box 77, S-175 22 Jarfalla, Sweden
"No problems." -- Alf
Tel: +46 758-202 50  EUnet:    rclaeson@ERBE.SE  uucp:   uunet!erbe.se!rclaeson
Fax: +46 758-197 20  Internet: rclaeson@ERBE.SE  BITNET: rclaeson@ERBE.SE