Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!etive!hwcs!nick From: nick@cs.hw.ac.uk (Nick Taylor) Newsgroups: comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Electoral Systems (Was: Who Controls the Network?) Message-ID: <2111@brahma.cs.hw.ac.uk> Date: 5 Jan 89 10:33:34 GMT Reply-To: nick@cs.hw.ac.uk (Nick Taylor) Organization: Computer Science, Heriot-Watt U., Scotland Lines: 37 Sorry, but I don't get any of the talk.* groups and I have this irrepressible urge to remove some of the confusion which seems to exist with regard to electoral systems. Australian Rules is the Alternative Vote system. It is not STV (the Single Transferable Vote). STV is not appropriate when only one candidate is to be elected because it boils down to the Alternative Vote (AV) system under these circumstances. STV is based on the idea of multi-member constituencies and attempts to reflect the percentage of the vote for a party in the percentage of seats which they gain. With only one seat up for grabs it is identical to the AV system. The French system works well in France because, after the first round of voting, the parties normally negotiate to ensure that only two candidates stand in the second round. They can do this because French politics boils down to a Left-Right battle (Ie. a two-horse race). Mind you it is quite conceivable that the cause and effect might be the other way round. Personally, I don't see why STV could not be used to elect the Electoral College in US Presidential elections. It seems absurd that ALL of the votes cast by a state in the Electoral College should go to ONE candidate when it would be a very simple matter to distribute them to the candidates in the same proportions as the popular vote. But why mess about with an Electoral College anyway? Why not use the popular vote? I like the NOTA idea but I doubt that many voters would bother to go to the trouble of turning up to vote for it. I thought that it was possible for a voter to add a candidate of his/her own choice to the ballot paper in US elections anyway. Am I wrong? Yours, * Old/Saint Nick * Delete as applicable! GIVE TEXAS BACK TO MEXICO !