Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!xanth!cs.odu.edu!tadguy
From: tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Bob is on vacation - Was: Re: Three big warnings ..
Summary: testing not necessary
Message-ID: <7088@xanth.cs.odu.edu>
Date: 7 Jan 89 23:23:41 GMT
References: <2838@cbnews.ATT.COM> <40ababfa.87ad@apollo.COM> <3225@sugar.uu.net>
Sender: news@xanth.cs.odu.edu
Reply-To: tadguy@cs.odu.edu (Tad Guy)
Organization: Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Lines: 13
In-reply-to: peter@sugar.uu.net (Peter da Silva)

In article <3225@sugar.uu.net>, peter@sugar (Peter da Silva) writes:
>If he's not going to test anything, you might as well have an unmoderated
>group.

Not true -- the moderator's main duty is to filter out the non-source
and non-binary postings.  This alone is sufficient reason to have a
moderator.  Having decent archiving headers on the messages and
filtering out redundant postings is also a big win...

	...tad

-- 
Tad Guy         <tadguy@cs.odu.edu>     Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA