Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL From: SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: (none) Message-ID: <8901040129.aa12129@SMOKE.BRL.MIL> Date: 4 Jan 89 06:08:45 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 36 >We have had some problems with mail coming from info-apple. It has >been suggested to me that I have my mailing address changed. >Could you please change my address > from: urt%icst-nav@cmr.icst.nbs.gov > to: urt@nav.icst.nbs.gov This seems to need repeating from time to time. You may get VERY FRUSTRATED sending requests to change addresses or to unsubscribe (or even to subscribe, but if you aren't subscribed, you don't get to read this :-) to the list instead of the list owner!!! In general, the form for internet lists is that for every "list-name" there is a "list-name-request" to handles addresses. Info-apple-request@Brl.MIL is Brint Cooper (our local unsung - is that "seldom sung?" - hero) without whom this madness could not continue. NOTE (as long as I have your attention) that if "Sender" is INFO-APP@NDSUVM1 (BITNET subscribers), then Brint doesn't control your subscription. You can unsubscribe by sending the command UNSUBSCRIBE INFO-APP to LISTSERV@NDSUVM1 (Do try to remember that commands are sent to LISTSERV and NOT to the list). If you should happen to get strange messages or mail from LISTSERV@NDSUVM1 after an attempt to unsubscribe, send me a copy, and I'll see if I can't make sure you've been deleted from the list (not to be construed as encouraging anyone to unsubscribe; list owners just LOVE bounced mail from expired accounts 8-( [The Far Side shall return (I hope)] Murph Sewall Sewall@UCONNVM.BITNET Business School sewall%uconnvm.bitnet@mitvma.mit.edu [INTERNET] U of Connecticut {rutgers psuvax1 ucbvax & in Europe - mcvax} !UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL [UUCP] -+- My employer isn't responsible for my mistakes AND vice-versa! (subject to change without notice; void where prohibited) "Close enough for government work" - source unknown (naturally ;-)