Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sm.unisys.com!csun!cacsc222%mx
From: cacsc222%mx@csun.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Incorrect Predictions in Old PC Magazines
Message-ID: <1807@csun.edu>
Date: 2 Jan 89 22:51:42 GMT
References: <1574@helios.ee.lbl.gov>
Sender: news@csun.edu
Reply-To: cacsc222@mx.csun.edu (Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl)
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Lines: 14

In article <1574@helios.ee.lbl.gov> forrest@ux1.lbl.gov (Jon Forrest) writes:
>I was recently going through some old PC magazines from
>1984 and I was struck by the number of predictions made by
>columnists that turned out to be 100% wrong.

I was going thru an old BYTE, and there was a letter explaining why the mouse
(as provided on the Lisa(!)) was doomed to failure.  Seems to me there are a few
million Macs and PC's (and a few Ataris and Amigas) out there which contradict
this...


"Disclaimer?  We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!!!"
Scott Neugroschl
...!sm.unisys.com!csun!mx!cacsc222