Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:4331 comp.sys.intel:631
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!mcvax!unido!!ed
From: ed@imuse.uucp (Ed Braaten)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Erratum 21 (Was: Re: SCO Xenix System Hang)
Summary: Replacement of faulty parts
Message-ID: <317@imuse.uucp>
Date: 31 Dec 88 10:25:58 GMT
References: <766@wasatch.UUCP> <329@bilver.UUCP> <832@ramz.UUCP> <7067@ki4pv.uucp>
Organization: Intel GmbH, Munich, West Germany
Lines: 17

In article <7067@ki4pv.uucp>, tanner@ki4pv.uucp (Dr. T. Andrews) writes:
> I suppose that they could refuse in the same way that they refused to
> replace the parts which didn't work in "native" mode.  If they refuse
> to replace an alleged "32-bit" CPU which doesn't work in 32-bit mode,
> surely they can refuse to replace for something minor like this!

Could you please clarify?  Are you referring to the 32-bit multiply
bug in older 80386's?  Who refused you a replacement?


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Braaten                    | "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
Intel Semiconductor GmbH      |  the intelligence of the intelligent I 
Dornacher Strasse 1           |  will frustrate."  1 Corinthians 1:19 
8016 Feldkirchen bei Muenchen |  
West Germany                  | uucp: ed@imuse.uucp  Ph: +49 89 90992-426
-------------------------------------------------------------------------