Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!mit-eddie!killer!pollux!ti-csl!m2!holland
From: holland@m2.csc.ti.com (Fred Hollander)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Using VBL Tasks in Inits...
Message-ID: <66461@ti-csl.CSNET>
Date: 28 Dec 88 16:27:29 GMT
References: <6865@netnews.upenn.edu> <10569@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU>
Sender: news@ti-csl.CSNET
Reply-To: holland@m2.UUCP (Fred Hollander)
Organization: TI Computer Science Center, Dallas
Lines: 20

In article <10569@umn-cs.CS.UMN.EDU> imp@crayview.msi.umn.edu (Chuck Lukaszewski) writes:
>memory.  This will ensure that it doesn't go away.  If your process is intended
>to be permanent once the system is booted, you ought to go with the high
>memory option.

Ok, what's the consensus on this?  I'm not criticizing this suggestion.  I
would just like to know the right way to do this, since I'm writing my own
INITs to patch system traps.  I've been loading them into system heap as I
believed this was the popular way to do it.  What are the drawbacks of loading
in high memory?

>______________________________________________________________________________
>Chuck Lukaszewski          imp@crayview.msi.umn.edu               612 789 0931

Fred Hollander
Computer Science Center
Texas Instruments, Inc.
holland%ti-csl@csnet-rela

The above statements are my own and not representative of Texas Instruments.