Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:3723 comp.sys.mac:24745
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!mailrus!eecae!netnews.upenn.edu!linc.cis.upenn.edu!rubinoff
From: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Rubinoff)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Lightspeed Pascal V2 and Quickeys and Macromaker..
Message-ID: <6991@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 5 Jan 89 21:29:57 GMT
References: <3453@uoregon.uoregon.edu> <918@husc6.harvard.edu>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu.UUCP (Robert Rubinoff)
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 12

In article <918@husc6.harvard.edu> siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) writes:
>In article <3453@uoregon.uoregon.edu> pramod@uoregon.uoregon.edu (Pramod Daya) writes:
>>Is anyone else using the combination of the new Lightspeed Pascal and either    Quickeys or Apple's Macromaker ?   I find that the combination causes L.S.P. 
>	MacroMaker breaks a lot of things, and Lightspeed Pascal is one
>of them. I haven't heard of a problem with Quickeys,  though- some of
>us use the combination in-house and haven't had any problems.


Gee, I've got MacroMaker installed and don't have any trouble using LSP.  I've
put stops in, used stepping, Lightsbug, etc., without any trouble.  I haven't
actually defined any LSP macros with MacroMaker, though, so maybe that's a
relevant factor.