Xref: utzoo comp.text:2989 comp.unix.questions:10861
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!uwvax!tank!uxc!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!mcvax!unido!imuse!ed
From: ed@imuse.uucp (Ed Braaten)
Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.unix.questions,eunet.general
Subject: Why TeX?
Keywords: TeX, nroff, troff
Message-ID: <318@imuse.uucp>
Date: 31 Dec 88 13:13:48 GMT
Organization: Intel GmbH, Munich, West Germany
Lines: 33



What are the advantages of using TeX over nroff/troff? I've heard 
a lot about it, but since I don't have access to it, I've never
been able to try it out.  I chose nroff since it seems to be a 
standard tool available under most implementations of U**X.  
What are the major differences in the two systems?  Which is
more reliable, portable?

I had some trouble getting nroff to print all the special 
characters I need (umlauts & Cyrillic) since the printer I
have (Star NL-10) likes to see ASCII NUL's in some of its 
control sequences.  It works now, but since I don't have 
source to nroff, I had to do everything through the term
driving table nroff uses (/usr/lib/term/*).  Fortunately,
SCO provides source to a generic term driving table which
you can use to roll your own.  How flexible is TeX in this
area?  How portable would the solution be?

I would welcome any input from those of you familiar with both
systems...

Best wishes in 1989!



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Braaten                    | "Love the Lord your God with all your
Intel Semiconductor GmbH      |  heart and with all your soul and with 
Dornacher Strasse 1           |  all your strength."  Deuteronomy 6:5 
8016 Feldkirchen bei Muenchen |  
West Germany                  | uucp: ed@imuse.uucp  Ph: +49 89 90992-426
-------------------------------------------------------------------------