Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!tolerant.UUCP!uucp From: uucp@tolerant.UUCP (UNIX-UNIX Cp) Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Submission for comp-unix-microport Message-ID: <8901052120.AA14798@handel.TOLERANT> Date: 5 Jan 89 21:20:40 GMT Sender: uuclerk@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Lines: 16 Path: tolerant!voder!apple!rutgers!elbereth.rutgers.edu!ron.rutgers.edu!ron From: ron@ron.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport Subject: Re: Microport, Xenix, Interactive: Which one? Message-ID: Date: 1 Jan 89 19:26:27 GMT References: <285@longway.TIC.COM> Distribution: usa Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 5 It's a moot point. All the 386 system V ports are essentially the same one done by Interactive Systems. They are fairly decent Sys 5 R 3 ports and you can even get TCP for them. -Ron