Xref: utzoo soc.women:15347 news.groups:6586 soc.men:6487 news.admin:4361 alt.flame:3522
Path: utzoo!hoptoad!pacbell!ames!mailrus!rutgers!netsys!vector!gryphon!richard
From: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Newsgroups: soc.women,news.groups,soc.men,news.admin,alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Suggestion?
Message-ID: <9926@gryphon.COM>
Date: 23 Dec 88 09:59:19 GMT
References: <2457@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu> <1751@scolex> <1152@igloo.UUCP> <25629@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <7248@chinet.chi.il.us>
Reply-To: richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 16


1) What Bill Vajk does is completely meaningless. If he drops soc.women, big
deal. He doesnt feed anyone. Net effect = 0. REAL sites, BIG sites, that
have REAL downstream sites who they feed would have some impact if they
drop soc.women, yet they do it, don't tell anyone, yet still somehow
no great loss is incurred. Vajk id just goading you people. As jfh
pointed out, I'd think you'd WANT Vajk to drop soc.women.

2) Sue somebody about the net ? Right. Be famous. Be the first on your
block. Knock yourself out.



-- 
               ``Wake me up when it's time to go to sleep''
richard@gryphon.COM {b'bone}!gryphon!richard  gryphon!richard@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov