Xref: utzoo soc.women:15437 news.groups:6668 soc.men:6562 news.admin:4414 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!husc6!rutgers!ucsd!orion.cf.uci.edu!paris.ics.uci.edu!glacier.ics.uci.edu!tittle From: tittle@glacier.ics.uci.edu (Cindy Tittle) Newsgroups: soc.women,news.groups,soc.men,news.admin Subject: Re: A Suggestion? Message-ID: <2701@paris.ics.uci.edu> Date: 31 Dec 88 19:57:36 GMT References: <2457@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu> <1751@scolex> <1152@igloo.UUCP> <22112@apple.Apple.COM> <1278@igloo.UUCP> <25629@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <2276@spdcc.SPDCC.COM> <25717@sri-unix.SRI.COM> <15163@oddjob.UChicago.EDU> Sender: news@paris.ics.uci.edu Reply-To: Cindy Tittle Distribution: na Organization: University of California at Irvine: ICS Dept. Lines: 26 In article <15163@oddjob.UChicago.EDU> pooh@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Pooh) writes: . .I'm not at all in favor of rmgrouping or merging soc.women, but .hell, if I had my own site, I'd drop soc.women for the duration .of the "Experiment" (read: Discrimination) too. Each and every .time. . I agree with this, actually. But *what* Experiment? I do not recognize its validity, and a number of other women have also stated their opposition. Without a consensus, how can we say that this month is indeed off limits to males? If you really don't want to hear from the guys, a little attention to your kill file should do it... Sigh. I try not to post flames, but I really don't want people thinking that there is a real live Experiment going on this month. No way! If you have something of interest to this group, post it, for heaven's sake! Don't worry about your gender! --Cindy (donning the asbestos suit) -- So many worlds, so much to do, | ARPA: tittle@ics.uci.edu \ So little done, such things to be | BITNET: cltittle@uci.bitnet /\ --Tennyson | UUCP: {sdcsvax|ucbvax}!ucivax!tittle