Xref: utzoo soc.singles:26938 soc.women:15424 soc.men:6550 alt.flame:3620 news.misc:2491 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!noao!ncar!ames!elroy!gryphon!oleg From: oleg@gryphon.COM (Oleg Kiselev) Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men,alt.flame,news.misc Subject: Re: Steve Suppportive strikes again Summary: O'Connor is on drugs, BAD drugs Keywords: celocanths Message-ID: <10133@gryphon.COM> Date: 30 Dec 88 11:37:12 GMT References: <12857@steinmetz.ge.com> Reply-To: oleg@gryphon.COM (Oleg Kiselev) Followup-To: alt.flame Organization: HASA Lines: 56 In article <12857@steinmetz.ge.com> oconnor%sungod@steinmetz.UUCP writes: >] Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men,alt.flame > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >What do these newsgroups have in common ? A high signal-to-flame ratio. Just WHICH group is O'Connor insulting? Alt.flame?! HAHAHAHAHA! >] Followup-To: rec.railroads > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Why the explicitly-set followup to a totally unrelated group ? >Just trying to make trouble, I'd say. This is one complete asshole. Exactly. And why did O'Connor followup to all the groups on the list? Just to make more trouble, I'd say. > >An unprovoked ad hominem attack. What, did "bgt@homxc.UUCP" offend >Richie and Richie's just GOTTA have revenge ? bgt@homxc had offended a number of people. So did O'Connor. So did I. So did Sexton. So did a number of people. Now, Sexton offended O'Connor and O'Connor just GOTTA have revenge ? >Up till now I've always had contempt and loathing for Richard Sexton. O'Connor forgets to mention the reasons for that loathing. Sexton is a better flamer and is a well known NET.personality... >Now I feel pity as well. What a miserable life he must have. Yes, if O'Connor had a house full of wife and children and was a highly respected expert in anything, his life'd be miserable too. >He'd be >better of, and so would we, if his feed(s) dropped him. Then he could pay >for the professional mental help he needs instead of paying phone bills. Sexton has no newsfeeds. Sexton is a nobody. If O'Connor thinks GRYPHON is Sexton's machine, he is laboring under a misconception. Then again, O'Connor may be a misconception himself. >To the SA(s) of his feed(s) : consider your responsibility as one >human being to other human beings. Drop gryphon soon, before Richard >Sexton goes over the edge. It's for his own good. [Bogosity rating: .01 m-gilley] Dennis O'Connor is definitely on really bad drugs. Before anyone takes his rantings seriously, do yourself a favour -- take a look at GRYPHON's USENET map entry and see how many sites GRYPHON is feeding. Then forget O'Connor ever said anything. -- "No regrets, no apologies." -- Ronald Reagan Oleg Kiselev ARPA: lcc.oleg@seas.ucla.edu, oleg@gryphon.COM (213)337-5230 UUCP:...!ucla-cs!lcc!oleg