Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!decvax!tektronix!midas!jeffw From: jeffw@midas.TEK.COM (Jeff Winslow) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: 9-volt / rocket launcher? (Poll) Keywords: poll,wisdom,knowledge,responsibility Message-ID: <3835@midas.TEK.COM> Date: 4 Jan 89 17:15:37 GMT References: <2557@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <2862@kitty.UUCP> <12974@cup.portal.com> <2867@kitty.UUCP> <13062@cup.portal.com> <1575@kodak.UUCP> Reply-To: jeffw@midas.UUCP (Jeff Winslow) Followup-To: somewhere.else Distribution: na Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 30 In article <13062@cup.portal.com> mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson) writes: >Am I right or am I wrong? C'mon net.electronics, pass judgement on Larry >Lippman vs. me! Do you want maximum facts, or just the facts you can be >trusted with? It would be dangerous for anyone to have more than the facts they could be trusted with. Think about what the phrase means, literally, and you'll see what I mean. The problem is that nobody knows which facts I can be trusted with, and I sure as hell want more than the facts somebody else thinks I can be trusted with, whether that someone else is Mark or Larry or the Federal government (especially them) or anyone else! Therein lies the rub. Three or four years ago, I would have said the net community was restricted enough that your information would be very unlikely to get to someone who would misuse it. Now I'm not so sure. On the other hand, your information would not be all that hard to figure out on one's own. Thus the loud trumpeting about "irresposible people setting off bombs" right and left seems to me a rather self-righteous overreaction - you didn't make possible something that was formerly impossible, you just made it a little easier. Of course, the most obnoxious articles are ones like this, that go on and on about the issue in sci.electronics, and then say "any further discussion should go somewhere else". :-) In short, a plague on both your houses. Jeff Winslow