Path: utzoo!telly!ziebmef!cks From: cks@ziebmef.uucp (Chris Siebenmann) Newsgroups: can.uucp Subject: Re: size of smail Message-ID: <1989Jan10.022127.15145@ziebmef.uucp> Date: 10 Jan 89 07:21:21 GMT References: <1989Jan2.001754.11708@ziebmef.uucp> <1989Jan2.222329.27995@lsuc.uucp> <1120@ncrcan.Toronto.NCR.COM> <433@aurora.AthabascaU.CA> Reply-To: cks@ziebmef.UUCP (Chris Siebenmann) Distribution: can Organization: Ziebmef Public Access Unix, Toronto, Ontario Lines: 43 In article <433@aurora.AthabascaU.CA> lyndon@auvax.UUCP (Lyndon Nerenberg) writes: ... >I'm still waiting to hear what it is that's so big about smail that >makes it not worthwhile running on smaller machines ... It seems to me that smail3.1 will either give me a lot of features I have no use for (like SMTP delivery on a machine with only UUCP), or has got a lot of overhead for the simple and probably most common case. It is highly likely that the aims of the smail3.1 authors do not include making a small effecient mailer for uucp-only systems (or systems with uucp plus an internal network). I have no objection to this; I just wish they would call their mailer something besides smail, so as not to mislead and disappoint all the uucp sites which are expecting something of roughly comparable size and functionality to smail2.5 but with the bugs fixed. smail3.1 sounds far too much like an upgrade to smail2.5; by all accounts, it isn't, so I wish they'd stop confusing people (heck, the smail3.1 list occasionally gets the occasional bug-fix or problem report for smail2.5, a pretty clear indication people are confused about this). >[ and yes, I'm still going to post the sizes, as soon as an unnamed > technician type around here gets me back on the ethernet :-( ] I'm looking forward with great interest to finding out the sizes (if you have a version of smail2.5 handy, compiling it and telling us the comparative sizes would be handy). Oh why can't anyone build small single-purpose programs any more? [Obligatory answer: because smail3.1 is solving a large and intractable problem, not the small and simple one smail2.5 solves. It's just not a problem that I have, so I don't feel I should pay the overhead for it.] [I'll get off my hobby-horse now, I think...] -- "Hey, thats's why Dad moved to Colorado. He sits Zen now. Me, I like the mountains." Chris Siebenmann uunet!{utgpu!moore,attcan!telly}!ziebmef!cks cks@ziebmef.UUCP or .....!utgpu!{,ontmoh!,ncrcan!brambo!}cks