Xref: utzoo comp.ai:3032 talk.philosophy.misc:1798 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!xanth!ukma!rutgers!att!whuts!homxb!homxc!marty From: marty@homxc.ATT.COM (M.B.BRILLIANT) Newsgroups: comp.ai,talk.philosophy.misc Subject: Re: Artificial Intelligence and Intelligence Summary: Maybe intelligence is the "improvement" Message-ID: <4882@homxc.ATT.COM> Date: 9 Jan 89 16:37:00 GMT References: <552@soleil.UUCP> <687@htsa.uucp> Organization: AT&T BL Holmdel NJ USA Lines: 36 In article <687@htsa.uucp>, fransvo@htsa.uucp (Frans van Otten) writes: > .... I really > stick to my definition of intelligence: > > *** Intelligence: The ability to draw a conclusion. > > *** Needed: A database and an algorithm to reach a conclusion > based on the data. > > *** Improvements: The ability to change the database. > The conclusion-algorithm being part of the database, > so that the system can add/change algorithms. I like this formulation because I think it contains the key to the definition of intelligence. An expert system can draw a conclusion using a database and an algorithm. I would not call it intelligent. Intelligence is a generalization of this capability, namely, the "Improvements" at the end of the list. It is not sufficient to be able to go one only step further, and have a database of databases, and a database of algorithms, and an algorithm for choosing new databases and new algorithms. Intelligence implies the ability to create an arbitrary number of levels of databases of databases, and databases of algorithms, and algorithms for choosing databases and algorithms from the preceding level. I suggest that the ability to reach an indefinite number of levels of generalization distinguishes intelligence from mere computation. M. B. Brilliant Marty AT&T-BL HO 3D-520 (201) 949-1858 Home (201) 946-8147 Holmdel, NJ 07733 att!houdi!marty1 Disclaimer: Opinions stated herein are mine unless and until my employer explicitly claims them; then I lose all rights to them.