Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!buengc!bph
From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Fun with the semantics of paradox
Message-ID: <1914@buengc.BU.EDU>
Date: 17 Jan 89 16:09:23 GMT
References: <1883@buengc.BU.EDU> <2996@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> <905@ubu.warwick.UUCP>
Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton)
Followup-To: comp.ai
Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng.
Lines: 16

In article <905@ubu.warwick.UUCP> mirk@uk.ac.warwick.cs (Mike Taylor) writes:
>Two people have individually stated in this debate that there are 5
>truth values, these being True, False, Ambiguous, Undecidable and
>Meaningless.

Wounds more like a communication problem, to me.  Like my ol' anthro
professor usedtasay:

There are three levels of truth:

	1.  The Truth;
	2.  What People Believe is the Truth;
	3.  What People Tell You They Believe is the Truth.

				--Blair
				  "...and whatever my urinalysis says..."