Path: utzoo!dciem!client2!king
From: king@client2.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Bubbles (was Re: Solid State Secondary Storage)
Message-ID: <1387@client2.dciem.dnd.ca>
Date: 20 Jan 89 13:09:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: client2.1387
References: <248@vlsi.ll.mit.edu> <2409@garth.UUCP> <1012@vsi.COM> <4070@omepd.UUCP> <2816@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM>
Reply-To: king@client2.dciem.dnd.ca (Stephen King)
Distribution: comp
Organization: D.C.I.E.M., Toronto, Canada
Lines: 13

In article <2816@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> kleinman@hplabsz.UUCP (Bruce Kleinman) writes:
>The company (Intel) disavowed any knowledge of bubble memories, as well.  The
>1 Mbit and 4 Mbit products were cancelled with *zero* advance notification to
>customers.  This sort of thing does not do wonders for bubble's reputation.

Yeah. Does even less for Intel's reputation.
Prior to this, bubble memory was the only Intel product I could use
without feeling ill.

Need I mention that these are (only) my opinions?
-- 
  {utzoo|mnetor}!dciem!zorac!dretor!king  or  king%dretor@zorac.dciem.dnd.ca
  Stephen J King   =-=   DCIEM Human Factors Division   =-=   (416) 635-2149