Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpl-opus!hpccc!hp-ses!hpcuhb!hpindda!kmont
From: kmont@hpindda.HP.COM (Kevin Montgomery)
Newsgroups: comp.cog-eng
Subject: Re: Time to Speech recognition (WAS: One Step... (long!))
Message-ID: <3500006@hpindda.HP.COM>
Date: 18 Jan 89 01:13:29 GMT
References: <6890@june.cs.washington.edu>
Organization: HP Information Networks, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 14

/ hpindda:comp.cog-eng / root@radar.UUCP (root) /  5:55 am  Jan 16, 1989 /
In article <69@poppy.warwick.ac.uk> maujt@warwick.ac.uk (Richard J Cox) writes:
> >How about using some kind of DNA finger printing? - take a small sample
> >of blood (ouch!) and check on this. This would be almost impossible to fool.
> Be serious. Besides the invasiveness of the procedure, it's just too slow and
> labor intensive using present technology.

(opinion-on)
not to mention foolable!  You've got to get the sample somehow, and 
I'd think getting ahold of someone's blood would be a lot easier than
a map of their retina.
(opinion-off)

				kev