Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!mailrus!sharkey!atanasoff!jwright
From: jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (Jim Wright)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: PC Pursuit pricing amendment
Message-ID: <633@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 89 06:37:21 GMT
References: <8901050251.AA14569@nessus.telenet.com> <2384@isis.UUCP> <7400@chinet.chi.il.us> <630@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> <7410@chinet.chi.il.us>
Reply-To: jwright@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (Jim Wright)
Organization: Iowa State U. Computer Science Department, Ames, IA
Lines: 19

In article <7410@chinet.chi.il.us> patrick@chinet.chi.il.us (Patrick A. Townson) writes:
>The second letter from Telenet, which amended the original letter from last
>weekend, referred to DETAILED billing after the initial 30 hour package was
>used.

Yes, they referred to this.
Does this mean they'll include both dollars AND cents?  :-)

>If the bill for Pursuit even slightly resembles the bill for Telemail
>(a Telenet product for which I have an account) or the billing sent to their
>corporate customers, it will be *quite* detailed.

Ok, if it does, good.  I'd like to know this before the bill arrives.

>The tone of your message makes it sound as if those people are real shysters
>who practice mail fraud by sending out undocumented bills. 

This wasn't intended.  I hoped to make that clear in the final line of
the posting.  (Referred to obvious exaggeration in message.)