Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!ncar!tank!uxc!iuvax!rutgers!njin!princeton!njsmu!mccc!pjh From: pjh@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg) Newsgroups: comp.edu Subject: Re: Student preparedness Message-ID: <570@mccc.UUCP> Date: 11 Jan 89 14:50:16 GMT References: <52767@pyramid.pyramid.com> <5053@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> <56@rpi.edu> <9252@ut-emx.UUCP> <556@mccc.UUCP> <14508@srcsip.UUCP> Reply-To: pjh@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg) Organization: The College On The Other Side of U. S. Route 1 Lines: 26 In article <14508@srcsip.UUCP> shankar@haarlem.UUCP (Son of Knuth) writes: =In article <556@mccc.UUCP> pjh@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg) writes: => If we could only getthem to read the text BEFORE they came to =>class! Then notes could be taken on what they didn't understand when =>they read it, and they would actually learn a lot more. = =If we [students] could only get them [profs] to not lecture by going =through the text page by page, then maybe we would read the material =before going to class. What's the point of reading something that you =know is going to be repeated when you go to class. = =Catch-22. Exactly! So what's the better route? Assume that students will read assigned material, or not? In a community college where we are trying to convert non-learners to learners, we can't afford to punish for failure to read (e.g., pop quizzes on the assigned reading). So how can we encourage students to do the reading? In a positive way? Pete -- Pete Holsberg UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh Mercer College CompuServe: 70240,334 1200 Old Trenton Road GEnie: PJHOLSBERG Trenton, NJ 08690 Voice: 1-609-586-4800