Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!oliveb!felix!arcturus!evil
From: evil@arcturus.UUCP (Wade Guthrie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: portability
Summary: Microsoft
Message-ID: <3377@arcturus>
Date: 12 Jan 89 22:05:01 GMT
References: <1354@tank.uchicago.edu>
Organization: Rockwell International, Anaheim, CA
Lines: 18

In article <1354@tank.uchicago.edu>, goer@sophist.uucp (Richard Goerwitz) writes:
> QUESTION:  What compiler for use under MS-DOS is the most
> portable?  . . .

I have had a lot of luck with Microsoft C (not Quick-C, for which I can
say nothing as I have not tried it).  It seems to be one of the richest
versions of the language I have seen and it makes small, fast code.  You
can certainly utilize its capabilities to write (expansive) code that
is portable.


Wade Guthrie
evil@arcturus.UUCP
Rockwell International
Anaheim, CA

(Rockwell doesn't necessarily believe / stand by what I'm saying; how could
they when *I* don't even know what I'm talking about???)