Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!enea!kth!draken!obg
From: obg@nada.kth.se (Olof Backing)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Elm 2.1 and Smail 2.5
Message-ID: <749@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 16 Jan 89 15:27:36 GMT
References: <744@draken.nada.kth.se> <570@merkin.cactus.org>
Reply-To: obg@nada.kth.se (Olof Backing)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 24

In article <570@merkin.cactus.org> hack@merkin.cactus.org (Greg Hackney) writes:
.....
>Also, it would be of help if you posted a sample of your mail file
>so we can see what the headers look like.
>--
>Greg

And here it comes! It looks like this:

From obg  Mon Jan 16 15:56:22 1989 remote from jakelt
Received: by jakelt.se (smail2.5)
	id AA00548; 16 Jan 89 15:56:22 MDT (Mon)
Message-Id: <8901161556.AA00548@jakelt.se>
Date: 16 Jan 89 15:56:22 MDT (Mon)
From: obg@jakelt.se (Olof Backing)
To: obg@nada.kth.se

What do you say? Isn't this a correct header?

-- 
WHOAMI: Olof Backing                                 EMAIL:
WHERE:  Royal Institute Of Technology, Stockholm     obg@nada.kth.se
SNAIL:  Havrevagen 14, S-175 43 Jarfalla, Sweden
VOICE:  + 46 758 355 16