Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!LINDY.STANFORD.EDU!hjs
From: hjs@LINDY.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: RE Network Monitors
Message-ID: <8901120333.AA28795@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 11 Jan 89 04:18:54 GMT
References: <24043.8901101325@brahma.cs.hw.ac.uk>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10

Your statement that the SpiderMonitor uses an intelligent board w.
microprocessor whereas "the others" (LANalyzer and Sniffer) use
"dumb boards" is totally false. All three products use boards that
have something at least as powerful as an 80186, 10 Mhz, and 512KB of
RAM. The top-of-the-line LANalyzer has even more horsepower on-board.

Please try and be more careful about making statements about the products
of competitors in a public forum. Here you will get caught. Unfortunately
spreading wrong competitive information directly rarely is! Welcome to
the U.S.A. Spider!