Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!xanth!mcnc!ecsvax!pedersen@cartan.Berkeley.EDU From: pedersen@cartan.Berkeley.EDU (Sharon L. Pedersen) Newsgroups: comp.society.women Subject: Re: Women and Usenet Message-ID: <6227@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> Date: 12 Jan 89 22:58:53 GMT Sender: skyler@ecsvax.uncecs.edu Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 77 Approved: skyler@ecsvax.uncecs.edu (Moderator -- Trish Roberts) Comments-to: comp-women-request@cs.purdue.edu Submissions-to: comp-women@cs.purdue.edu In article <6218@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> you write: > >I am very curious why more women don't post to the net and I'd >like to find out why. It's OK to post this. It is long--about 80 lines. First, do women post in proportion to their _access_ to the net? (I know, I apologize, this is the kind of bonehead question that sometimes makes me think, "Who cares what the statistics say is to be expected, I want to hear more women's voices!", or "Who cares what men are doing, I hear about them from dawn to dusk, I want to know about women!" Even so, it seems that the answer to this question has some relevance, although finding that answer won't be easy.) I sometimes post to the net. Thinking back over the past months, I recall posting: -- requests for information, e.g., "What's the law on carrying ID?" "What kinds of bicycle panniers do people like?" -- new information I've discovered that's made a difference in my life, e.g., "Ibuprofen relieves menstrual cramps completely!" "How to cycle effectively in traffic!" -- contributing a different viewpoint to a discussion, e.g., "_The_Princess_Bride_ isn't _completely_ wonderful, because of the idiot way the character Buttercup is presented" (in response to a posting that TPB was a fantastic movie) -- contributing stories of my (or my friends') experience to a thread, e.g., "A Tale of Two Math Majors" (to a thread about women and being encouraged or discouraged from math). Sometimes these stories present a different view from what's been said so far; sometimes they enthusiastically "second the motion"--"Gosh are you ever right, let me tell you what happened to _me_!" I sometimes refrain from posting, even though I've had definite thoughts in response to an article. Sometimes I feel OK about not posting. For example, -- I agree with a posting and it reminds me of something in my life, but I don't think what I have to say is sufficiently different from what anyone alse has said on the subject to be worth using the bandwidth. -- I disagree vehemently with a posting, but I don't think I'm going to change anybody's mind by what I could say. Sometimes I don't feel OK about not posting. I want to post, but I don't quite know what to say. For example, -- I disagree very much with someone, and think that I could change some people's minds, but I feel like any response I make will be rude to the original poster. (Maybe I could learn that disagreeing does not make me disagreeable?) -- My reaction has its roots in my feminism, and I'm afraid I'll get flamed for introducing "irrelevant/whining/stupid/over-sensitive/reverse-sexist politics" into a nice apolitical newsgroup. Which I don't agree with--the personal is political, and, other people's worldviews are as much a part of their posts on _any_ sumject as my worldview is of mine, and, anyway, feminism is the only reasonable way to think :-)--but still the fear of being attacked makes me hesitate to post. It's one thing to be told, "I didn't experience it that way." It's quite another to be told, "I didn't experience it that way, and you shouldn't have either, and even if you did, I don't want to hear about it." -- --Sharon Pedersen pedersen@cartan.berkeley.edu, ucbvax!cartan!pedersen