Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!ncar!gatech!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!ssbn!bill From: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Comments on INSERT.c (was: Re: It is better to remain silent...) Summary: Let's move it back where it came from Message-ID: <529@ssbn.WLK.COM> Date: 9 Jan 89 04:21:25 GMT References: <308@twwells.uucp> Reply-To: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) Followup-To: alt.sources Distribution: na Organization: W.L. Kennedy Jr. and Associates, Pipe Creek, TX Lines: 20 In article webber@athos.rutgers.edu (Bob Webber) writes: >In article <308@twwells.uucp>, bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells) writes: >> It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and >> remove all doubt. I felt moved to follow up when Bill posted here but I didn't because I felt fairly sure that Bob would. I don't frequently side with Bob or Bill, but this time I'm going to side with Bob. Bill brought this over from alt.sources and stuck it here. Bob followed up here, why not? Seems logical to me. I'm following up Bob's article to ask that any ensuing discussion go back over to alt.sources, where Bob posted in the first place. It doesn't make a lot of sense to discuss it in a comp group where the original article never appeared. Bill stated his points, Bob answered them, can we keep (any of) the rest over where it started? Thanks, -- Bill Kennedy usenet {killer,att,cs.utexas.edu,sun!daver}!ssbn!bill internet bill@ssbn.WLK.COM