Path: utzoo!censor!becker!bdb From: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: amiga 2500UX Keywords: amiga-unix amix 2500UX Message-ID: <226@becker.UUCP> Date: 21 Jan 89 07:50:47 GMT References: <974@cc-krs.UUCP> <11280@swan.ulowell.edu> <15088@cisunx.UUCP> Reply-To: bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce Becker) Organization: G. T. S., Toronto, Ontario Lines: 40 In article <15088@cisunx.UUCP> ejkst@unix.cis.pittsburgh.edu (Eric J. Kennedy) writes: >In article <11280@swan.ulowell.edu> page@swan.ulowell.edu (Bob Page) writes: >>kim@cc-krs.UUCP (Kim Lilliestierna) wrote: >>>Has anybody heard anything about the 2500UX machine. Suposed to >>>come with 68020 and AMIX ( sys V.3)? >> >>It exists. It works. Has an MMU. The custom windowing system (not > >Any idea whether it allows Unix and AmigaDOS simultaneously, or Unix and >MS-DOS simultaneously? None that they were willing to talk about. The 2500UX was shown here recently; I pressed them about Amiga stuff under AMIX - the current plans don't seem to include it at all, which I found quite disappointing. The notion of source-code compatibility isn't in the cards either as far as I could tell, which is a shame in my view. It's harder to understand what value there is (except "gee-whiz" perhaps) to having a Unix on the Amiga which doesn't take a lot of advantage of the Amiga hardware niceties. Otherwise it's too much "me-too" to be a big hit (or so I think - other opinions?) As a Unix implementation it seems competent, and they've rolled their own windowing user interface as is all the rage these days... Nothing about X, NeWS, Open Look, etc... They have done a super job on text scrolling - *really fast*... "Source code? We're not sure yet..." - folks, let them know about the evils of sourcelessness in Unix... >Eric Kennedy >ejkst@cisunx.UUCP Cheers, -- _ _/\ Bruce Becker Toronto, Ont. \`o O| Internet: bdb@becker.UUCP, bruce@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu \(")/ BitNet: BECKER@HUMBER.BITNET ---mm-U-mm--- "Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue" - Oliver North