Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Is anyone here interested in the "Future of Apple //?"
Message-ID: <9346@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 12 Jan 89 05:25:40 GMT
References: <5678@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1209@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> <9323@smoke.BRL.MIL> <5747@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <788@convex.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <788@convex.UUCP> buyse@concave.UUCP (Russell C. Buyse) writes:
>Parallelism is not required for the next Apple II.  What is required is
>much faster scalar execution and enhanced graphics capabilities.  These
>are both well-known quantities that can be produced by Apple Computer.

Support for multitasking would also be extremely useful.
Note that that is a separate issue from multiple processors.