Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:5207 comp.unix.questions:11058
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-ncis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!spdcc!cspencer
From: cspencer@spdcc.COM (Cliff Spencer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Terminal emulator for 6386 under UNIX(r)
Keywords: 6386, UNIX, cu
Message-ID: <2412@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>
Date: 12 Jan 89 15:30:17 GMT
References: <9877@drutx.ATT.COM> <4861@mtgzz.att.com> <563@mccc.UUCP> <4877@mtgzz.att.com>
Reply-To: cspencer@ursa-major.spdcc.COM (Cliff Spencer)
Distribution: comp
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Lines: 9

In article <4877@mtgzz.att.com> avr@mtgzz.att.com (a.v.reed) writes:
>In article <563@mccc.UUCP>, pjh@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg) writes:
>Fair enough - I was thinking of the (clearly redundant) BSD "script".
>Here is what you want from standard UNIX tools. Let "dialog.cu" be a

I don't think script is "clearly redundant". Script runs the subshell
under a pty, so programs think they are on a terminal. I don't imagine
you can achieve the same effect with pipes.
					-cliff