Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!bwong
From: bwong@sundc.UUCP (Brian Wong)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: DECstation 3100 info.
Message-ID: <8492@sundc.UUCP>
Date: 17 Jan 89 14:52:36 GMT
References: <979@isieng.UUCP> <85330@sun.uucp> <278@daitc.daitc.mil>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Vienna, VA
Lines: 19

In article <278@daitc.daitc.mil>, jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil (Jonathan Krueger) writes:
> In article <558@oracle.UUCP>, rbradbur@hqpyr1 (Robert Bradbury) discusses:
> 	Interfaces that support software portability
> 	Application binary interfaces
  [quote from bradbury deleted]
> he is arguing against the latter.  No, that's not a typo: he may
> think he's arguing for the latter, but the inability of machine
> architectures to specify program compatibility across OS releases
> turns his point against the latter.

Jonathan,
  Could you please explain this?  I don't think I'm the only one who
doesn't understand your logic here.  I don't mean to be flip.  I genuinely
don't follow you here.


-- 
Brian Wong					Sun Microsystems
bwong@sun.com					Vienna, Va.  703-883-1243