Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!watdcsu!dmurdoch
From: dmurdoch@watdcsu.waterloo.edu (D.J. Murdoch - Statistics)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Request for poll of ten best/worst
Message-ID: <5397@watdcsu.waterloo.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 89 13:58:55 GMT
References: <210@imspw6.UUCP> <216100074@trsvax> <1284@skinner.nprdc.arpa> <7593@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: dmurdoch@watdcsu.waterloo.edu (D.J. Murdoch - Statistics)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 16

In article <7593@watcgl.waterloo.edu> smvorkoetter@watmum.waterloo.edu (Stefan M. Vorkoetter) writes:
>In article <1284@skinner.nprdc.arpa> malloy@nprdc.arpa (Sean Malloy) writes:
>>In article <216100074@trsvax> johnm@trsvax.UUCP writes:
>
>>>Telix 3.11 - This is the most incredible piece of shareware I have ever had a
>>>chance to use and as a telecom package it leaves Procomm+ in its dust.
>
>>I got a copy of Telix to look over -- and wiped it off my disk fifteen
>>minutes later as being worthless. Why? My modem is on COM4. Telix, in
>>its infinite wisdom, requires the modem to be either COM1 or COM2. I

The current version of Telix (v3.11) supports COM1 to COM8.  Because 
the last 6 are non-standard, it lets you choose the I/O addresses and IRQ
lines for each, if the default values don't work.  

Telix?  I'm soaking in it now.