Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!watdcsu!hazela
From: hazela@watdcsu.waterloo.edu (Jose Reynaldo Setti)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Request for poll of ten best/worst
Summary: Telix 3.11
Message-ID: <5399@watdcsu.waterloo.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 89 15:45:22 GMT
References: <210@imspw6.UUCP> <216100074@trsvax> <1284@skinner.nprdc.arpa> <7593@watcgl.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: hazela@watdcsu.waterloo.edu (Jose Reynaldo Setti)
Organization: U. of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 27


>>>Telix 3.11 - This is the most incredible piece of shareware I have ever had a
>>>chance to use and as a telecom package it leaves Procomm+ in its dust.
>
>>I got a copy of Telix to look over -- and wiped it off my disk fifteen
>>minutes later as being worthless. Why? My modem is on COM4. Telix, in
>>its infinite wisdom, requires the modem to be either COM1 or COM2. I
>
>First, I market my own COM software, so I would be the last to push
>Telix on people :-).  I have seen Telix however and it is a good product.
>My COM software, and many others, do not support COM3 or COM4, since 
>there is no definition of COM3 or COM4.  The addresses and interrupt

Telix 3.11 is able to use any COM port. From COM1 to COM8.
(I've never heard of COM5 - COM8. Have you?)

I don't have anything to do with Telix. In fact, I was trying to
get Procomm when somebody gave me a copy of Telix to try. 

I'm still trying to digest everything, 
including the SALT script language that comes with it.
And of course, being able to support up to COM8 means
nothing, it could still be a piece of garbage. 

J.Setti 
The Transport Group  				Civil Engineering Dept.
UofWaterloo					Waterloo, Ontario - Canada